By: Elizabeth Reidy, Assurance Services

The windshield is bigger than the rearview mirror.

 

Given the volatile times in which organizations have been enduring over the past couple of years, it is important to be aware and be proactive when it comes to debt.  All it takes is one phone call or letter received to drastically change the funding structure of an organization.

A lender relationship is pertinent to the operations of most organizations who rely on financing and lines of credit for cash flow purposes and other needs.   Therefore, if the organization becomes aware of something that is going to affect the cash flow and funding of the organization which will prohibit it from making payments, and/or meeting the debt covenants set forth by the debt agreements, it is important that the organization be open and forthright with the lender.

When a loan covenant is violated, the lender has various actions they can take depending on the severity of the violation.  Generally, if the violation is for a less severe infraction, for example, not submitting financial statements on time, the lender will generally extend the deadline.  However, if the violation is more serious, for example, taking out additional debt without informing the lender or violating financial covenants, the lender may take more severe actions.  Depending on the agreement, the lender may have the right to seize assets pledged as collateral, call the debt, or impose more strict terms including higher interest rates or requiring additional pledges against the debt.

In order to maintain the relationship with the lender and minimize the action taken by the lender, the lender should be contacted as soon as possible once the possible violation has been discovered.  Waiting and withholding this information from the lender can cause suspicion about the organizations’ integrity and cause further issues which are preventable.

When contacting lenders to inform them of the possible violation of covenants, organizations should have an explanation as to why the covenants were not met and a tentative plan of correction.  This plan should include strategic financial information and projections portraying how the organization plans to improve.  The plan should be realistic and detailed.

Violating a loan covenant or defaulting on a payment is never a good situation to be facing.  However, if the organization is proactive in a timely manner and is prepared with a plan of action, it does not have to be fatal.

Share

By: Dave Brockman, CPA

We recently experienced a personal tragedy that has greatly impacted our family. A friend of our youngest son lost his life at the age of 19 on a typical summer day while with friends at a local lake. Wesley was simply going to jump into the lake to “cool off” on a 90 degree day. Wesley leaped from a pontoon boat into about 3 feet of water. When they realized he didn’t come back up they started looking for him and pulled him onto the boat.

One of the friends, Dan, a senior and member of the swim team at West Point Academy, began CPR on Wesley. Our son, Clay, called 911 and then helped Dan administer CPR. While they were able to revive him, they later learned that Wesley had broken his neck and was brain dead. While Dan and Clay were not able to save Wesley, they did keep his blood circulating making it possible for Wesley to donate four organs to save the lives of four others. By keeping him physically alive Wesley’s friends and family members got the chance to say “good bye”.

At the memorial service for Wesley, I learned so much more about a young man who had been coming to our home for years and swam with both of our boys on their high school swim team. Wesley was someone who always had a big smile on his face and seemed to possess an energy level that put the Energizer Bunny to shame! What I did not know was how Wesley used both of those characteristics, along with his caring attitude and passion for life to impact so many others.

Wesley is one of the best examples of servant leadership I have witnessed. Many of the students in attendance shared story after story about how Wesley put their needs first and his second. He was always seeking out ways to lift up the spirits of those around him.

One young lady told how when she first came to high school she was new to the area, along with Wesley. Wesley was one of the first people to befriend her and make her feel at home. They became best friends and she knew she could always count on Wesley to be there for her.

Another student shared their joint passion for cars. How Wesley would volunteer to stop by and help him wash and wax his car. Wesley picked out hundreds of potential decals for his friend’s car. All of this was done without being asked, but simply to show that Wesley was thinking of them and trying to be helpful.

I learned that Wesley was trying to do a remake of the TV show “Three’s Company”. Only his version was called “Six’s Company”. Yes, Wesley was living in a house with five females at The University of Akron. I cannot imagine the stories he could tell! Each of his roommates spoke about how Wesley not only looked out for each of them, but how he was the “go to” person whenever they were having roommate issues and how he always was doing something special for each of them.

One very special person in Wesley’s life was his sister, who had cerebral palsy. One of his cousins spoke about the love and the care that Wesley demonstrated for his sister. Wesley was never embarrassed by her and openly showed his love and affection for her to others. He was a big part of her life and spent a great deal of his own time caring for her.

My hope is that my sons, Wesley’s many young friends and all of us who attended his memorial service will find a way to make Wesley’s passion for servant leadership a part of our daily lives. Do more than think about it occasionally or act only when it is convenient. Always strive to put the needs of others ahead of our own.

By the way, one of the organs that Wesley donated was his heart. Can you imagine the lucky person that gets such a caring and giving heart? I hope that person reaches out and touches as many lives as Wesley!

Share

 

By: Tanya Dunkle, CPA

Manager, Assurance Services

Along with the benefits that a charitable organization receives from being exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code comes certain responsibilities related to the receipt of charitable contributions. All charitable organizations that receive contributions should be aware of the following IRS requirements:

Written Acknowledgment

Donors who make charitable contributions of $250 or more to a charitable organization cannot take an income tax deduction unless they obtain a written acknowledgment from the charitable organization to substantiate the contribution. Although it is ultimately the donor’s responsibility to obtain this written acknowledgement, organizations can assist their donors by providing substantiation in a timely manner. This acknowledgment must:

• Be in writing.

• Be contemporaneous.

• State the amount of any cash it received.

• State whether the organization gave the donor any intangible religious benefits or any goods or services in return for the donor’s contribution (a quid pro quo contribution).

• Describe goods or services the organization received (no value is necessary).

• Describe goods or services the organization gave, including a good faith estimate of the value.

It is also important to note that it is not necessary to include the donor’s social security number or tax identification number on the acknowledgment and there is no IRS form to fill out. A separate acknowledgment may be provided for each contribution of $250 or more from a single donor, or a combined statement can be used to substantiate several contributions from the same donor. In addition, the acknowledgment can be provided in the form of a paper document or electronically.

In order to qualify as being contemporaneous, the written acknowledgment must be received by the donor no later than the due date of the donor’s federal income tax return (including extensions), or the actual date that the donor files their return, if earlier.

Sometimes a charitable organization may provide goods or services in exchange for a contribution of $250 or more. If the value of these goods or services is not insubstantial, the organization is required to include an estimate of the value of the items provided in the written acknowledgment. The donor must then reduce the amount the contribution deduction claimed on their return by the value of the goods or services received.

Quid Pro Quo Contributions

In addition to the substantiation requirements discussed above for contributions of $250 or more, charitable organizations are also required to provide a written disclosure statement for all quid pro quo contributions received in the amount of $75 or more. A quid pro quo contribution is a payment received from a donor that is part contribution and part purchase of goods or services. A donor can only take a charitable deduction for the portion of the payment that exceeds the benefit that they received. The disclosure statement must:

• Be written.

• Estimate the value of the organization’s goods or services given in return for the donor’s contribution.

• Describe certain goods or services given to the donor’s employees or partners.

• Inform the donor that a charitable deduction is limited to the amount of the contribution less the value of the goods and services received in return.

The required disclosure statement may be provided either in connection with the solicitation or the receipt of the contribution. Further, the disclosure must be made in a manner that will be noticed by donors. Failure to provide the require disclosure statement can result in a penalty of $10 per contribution, not to exceed $5,000 per event or solicitation.

 

Share

By: Pam Wright, CPA

Manager, Assurance Services

With the increased need for revenue and the budget deadline approaching, the IRS is yet again taking action to build its coffers.

An area of focus lies on the proper classification of independent contractors vs. employees in the workplace.  The IRS has approximately 6,000 random business audits coming up to address this issue.  Organizations generally will use an independent contractor due to lack of resources internally and also for cost-cutting benefits.  The issue at hand is the understanding the proper classification between an independent contractor and an employee.  Basically, the federal government is looking to collect unpaid payroll taxes.

Why are some nonprofit organizations treating workers as independent contractors?

It’s not just the IRS that is facing hard times.  Nonprofit organizations all over the country are looking for ways to cut costs, including using, or at least classifying someone to be, an independent contractor.

Nonprofit organizations incur various costs associated with employees, such as social security, Medicare, workers compensation, health insurance, and retirement benefits, just to name a few.  Merely taking into account the employer’s share of social security and Medicare would save an organization 7.65% of payroll costs.

With the current economic environment and many individuals seeking employment (regardless of whether or not the organization is going to pay benefits), it makes sense for organizations to take this route.   The issue here is whether organizations understand the difference between independent contractors and employees.

So what exactly is the IRS looking at?

In order to determine if a worker is an employee vs. an independent contractor, the IRS is going to focus their examinations on the control of the individual providing the service. Specifically, they will be looking into the behavioral control, financial control, and relationship between the payer and service provider.

Behavioral control is whether or not the organization is providing training, giving detailed instructions as to the steps for completing the project and the specific evaluation process of the organization.

When evaluating financial control, the IRS will focus on items such as whether or not the service provider has the opportunity to make a profit or incur a loss, whether or not the organization has a significant investment in the project (i.e. are the organization’ equipment and facilities being used or is the service provider using their own) and is the organization reimbursing for expenses in the manner they would for a typical employee. In addition, method of payment such as paying per hour, salary, commission or a flat fee per job plays a large factor.

The IRS will also be looking at the type of relationship, for example if term is more permanent versus short term, i.e. does the service provider work for a number of organizations.  If the organization happens to be paying any type of benefits to the service provider, this also will trigger the possibility of an employee relationship.

What if the IRS determines that someone I treated as an independent contractor is an employee?

Depending on the nature and extent of the specific issue, the penalties can be substantial.

If it was an unintentional act and the organization did file a 1099 for the services (which is required in most cases for independent contractors receiving more than $600 a year), the employer will owe tax equal to 1.5% of the payments to the employee, 20% of the employee’s FICA liability, and all of the employer’s FICA liability.

However, if a 1099 was not filed, payment to the IRS doubles.  The employer will owe tax equal to 3% of the amount paid to the employee, 40% of the employee’s FICA liability, and all of the employer’s FICA liability.

On the other hand, if the IRS determines that this was an intentional misclassification, the employer may be liable for 100% of the employee’s FICA liability, the employee’s federal income tax withholding as calculated by the IRS and the employer’s share of the FICA liability.  And, let’s not forget to add on the typical fines and penalties which the IRS imposes for failure to file the payroll tax returns.

Determining your classifications – “How do I know if I’m choosing the right category?”

When it boils down to it, are you supervising the process along the way, do you share some of the project responsibility and are you assisting the service provider – or are you simply receiving an end product?  When evaluating those providing services to your organization, the following are a few questions you may want to ask.

Attributes of an independent contractor:

  • Can the worker make a profit or suffer a loss as a result of the work, aside from the money earned from the project?
  • Does the worker have an investment in the equipment and facilities used to do the work?
  • Does the person work for more than one organization at a time?
  • Does the worker offer services to the general public?

Attributes of an employee:

  • Do you have the right to give the worker instructions about when, where, and how to work?
  • Do you train the worker to do the job in a particular way?
  • Do you hire, supervise, and pay the worker’s assistants?
  • Do you set the worker’s hours?
  • Must the individual work on your premises, or do you control the route or location where the work must be performed?
  • Do you provide the worker with equipment, tools, or materials?

Contact your BCG&Co. advisor if you have questions about whether your arrangement with independent contractors will withstand the scrutiny of the IRS.

Share

By: Elizabeth Reidy, Assurance Services

Measurement is the first step that leads to control and eventually to improvement.

If you can’t measure something, you can’t understand it. If you can’t understand it, you can’t control it. If you can’t control it, you can’t improve it.”

- H. James Harrington

Sometimes a simple quotation can help explain a complex principle. There’s no question that evaluating the effectiveness of not-for-profit programs is beneficial both externally and internally.  But the complexity of how to effectively measure performance often perplexes organizations.

It’s important to understand why and when a not-for-profit organization should evaluate their performance.  External demands are often the primary reason nonprofits evaluate their work. But it is equally important that nonprofits proactively measure performance and effectiveness in order to learn and grow an organization.

Measurement of performance should be used just as much, if not more, as an internal building tool than an external tool.  It is important for organizations to develop ways to track data and implement a process to be able to effectively analyze the data to ensure that the organization is meeting its mission and program goals.  This will not only enable an organization to do more with less, but will also enable the organization to adapt to ever-changing circumstances This has never been more evident than in this “new economy” in which we find ourselves. Now more than ever, measuring your organization’s performance is expected of all stakeholders – be they funders and donors, those who benefit from your services, board members and employees.

Initiating a Lifecycle Measurement Process

So where and how do you begin? The process of measuring performance can seem like a daunting and confusing task to some not-for-profit leaders.  But the process of collecting and analyzing data does not need to be an overwhelming one.  An effective technique that can be used is to think about the process as a continuous lifecycle and to view measurement as a tool that can assist the organization within the cycle.  A successful approach is one in which the lifecycle has four valuable parts: Define, Measure, Learn and Improve.

Define: What your Organization aspires to achieve and what exactly it is that needs to be done to achieve those goals.

Measure: Collect information within a data system that will effectively tell your organization how it is performing.

Learn: Analyze the information collected and understand what works for the organization and what doesn’t.  Propose improvements that can be made as a result of the analysis.

Improve: Agree on and implement improvements based on the analysis performed.

Although each of these steps comes with challenges of their own, they will provide an organization with a toolbox of knowledge to continue to improve and grow the organization in a changing environment.

For further explanation of various techniques and tools that can be utilized in order to have an effective measurement process, along with real life examples of techniques that work, read more on this topic with a helpful article by Bridgespan: http://www.bridgespan.org/measurement-as-learning.aspx.

Share

By: Tom Hastings, CPA

Director, Assurance Services

Today, the Internal Revenue Service has released its list of 275,000 nonprofit organizations who have lost their tax-exempt status due to not meeting their annual filing requirements.  Prior to 2007, all nonprofits with certain levels of revenues and assets were required to file an annual informational return, Form 990, with the IRS.  This basically exempted the smallest of organizations, those with annual receipts less than $25,000, from any filing requirements.  However, beginning in 2007, all nonprofits have been required to meet an annual filing requirement with the implementation of the Form 990-N postcard for those smallest of nonprofits.  Those who failed to meet their annual filing requirements for three consecutive years are no longer tax-exempt, and will very soon be receiving notification of this from the IRS.

The list of nonprofits whose exempt status has been revoked, as well as more information on the reinstatement process, can be found on the IRS’ website.

http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=240239,00.html?portlet=7

So what are the implications?  First, donors will no longer be entitled to a tax deduction for contributions they make to these nonprofits.  Second, because they are no longer tax-exempt, these nonprofits will be required to file a corporate income tax return, Form 1120, and potentially pay income taxes on their “net earnings.”

Presumable, many of the organizations on the list have since gone out of business, thus, there would be no ramifications to them.  However, the list does include many organizations who still exist and will soon need to take the necessary steps to have their exemption status reinstated.

What are they to do?  Well, to have tax-exemption reinstated will basically require most organizations to start from scratch by filing the Form 1023 application for exemption and pay the necessary user fees.  In most cases, the effective date of reinstatement will be the date at which the application was submitted to the IRS, although, reinstatement as of the revocation date can be requested and may be allowed in certain circumstances.  Contact your nonprofit-trained CPA or tax attorney to get this process going.  Of course, the members of the BCG Nonprofit Practice Group would be glad to assist.

Share

By: Dave Brockman, CPA

“Whenever you see a successful business, someone once made a courageous decision.”

– Peter Drucker

So how are major decisions made within your organization? Are your most important decisions well thought out and who is involved in making them? Do you document your decision making process in some manner?

One of our affiliated organizations was facing some major decisions about their future direction. We engaged someone who specialized in their industry to guide us through a decision making framework that all involved felt was a very healthy process that lead us to good, sound business decisions for this organization.

While the industry expertise was helpful to get a handle on the state of the industry, a good facilitator using this decision-making framework would have been more than adequate to help us make the right decision. Here are some helpful guidelines from our experience that facilitated a solid decision making framework.

Define Your Goal

The process begins with establishing the overarching goal. Ask yourself: What is the issue you are trying to get resolved and where would you like the organization to end up? Our goal was “to transform the current business unit in order to drive significantly improved profitability, valuation and growth.”

Instill Guiding Principles

We then identified the guiding principles. Guiding principles are fundamental guidelines which will be adhered to as the options are being developed and discussed. Overall guiding principles should be aligned with regardless of the option being considered. These principles should be broad enough to apply regardless of the direction, but measurable with success metrics.

Examples of a few of our guiding principles were:

  • Change to a new business model must not materially risk the overall health (reputation and financial) of the organization.
  • Improve profitablity by improving EBITDA to 9-10% minimum within 36 months.
  • Attain ‘best in class’ performance by being at the top of revenue, revenue growth and client satisfaction measures.

Apply Success Metrics

Next we established success metrics that will be measured to evaluate the results of the chosen option and we identified dependencies, which are key people, processes or systems that will be critical to support the final decision and resulting actions.

Identify Stakeholders & Solicit Feedback

Another very important part of our process was to determine who are the advisors, deciders and executors. Advisors are key people with intimate knowledge of the current or future business model who actively participate in the process and eventually state their case and cast a single vote for their preferred option. Deciders will act in an advisor capacity but makes the final decision after carefully considering all input from the advisors. Executors will serve as a part of the team that develops the details behind the selected option and will play a key role in executing the model moving forward.

Ideally the advisors develop three options for consideration, define them and then evaluate them against the guiding principles that are established at the start of the process. Each advisor is asked to vote for or against each option and to clearly state their reasons to support or not support each option. This part of the process created great dialogue and a healthy debate of each option. The decider listened carefully to each advisor and ultimately made the decision about which option to pursue.

We found this decision making framework very helpful. It allowed for agreement upfront on what was important to any decision we made, allowed for an in-depth look at each option and led to what I believe was the right decision for our organization.

Share

According to a recent new release from the office of Summit County Executive Russell M. Pry, the availability of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Applications for the 2012 Funding year has been announced.

Summit County Executive Russell M. Pry announced his office of Community and Economic Development is seeking applications from units of local government and non-profit agencies for eligible CDBG projects for the upcoming 2012 program year.

CDBG funds must be used for activities that benefit low/mod income individuals or, in the case of infrastructure or public improvements, in low/mod census tracts. If CDBG funds are used for economic development, there are requirements for job creation and/or retention of jobs for low/mod individuals.

Eligible projects must be located within the County of Summit but outside the Cities of Akron, Barberton, and Cuyahoga Falls. Priorities for 2012 will focus on construction of public facilities and improvements, such as water and sewer facilities; public services, within certain limits; activities relating to energy conservation and renewable energy resources; and provision of assistance to profit-motivated businesses to carry out economic development and job creation/retention activities.

The County of Summit will be accepting “funding proposals,” which will be made available via the County of Summit, Department of Community and Economic Development website. The funding proposal application will be due no later than 4 p.m. on Thursday, June 30, 2011.

The application and additional information are available via the County of Summit website at:
http://www.co.summit.oh.us/executive/blkgrant.htm

Share

By: Geoffrey G. Whidden, Supervising Network Engineer, BCG Systems, Inc.

Raising money, in and of itself bears a cost. Efficient fundraising is critical to ensure you get the most buck-for-your-buck, so to speak.  Over the last decade, more development personnel have looked to the internet as a powerful fundraising tool.  There are a number of options available. The key is to find one that fits. Below are three of the most popular online donation solutions.

1. Be your own merchant
Perhaps the most ambitious is hosting your own site and processing credit cards directly.  This requires a merchant account and your site will need to be compliant with a stringent set of technical requirements (PCI DSS compliance) created by the payment companies (American Express, Discover, JCB, MasterCard and Visa).

If you anticipate enough transactions and volume on your online portal and want to incorporate this into a more detailed online campaign, then this may be worth the investment.  However, most of the other options require that the donor navigate off your page to a third-party site, and donors can become quite uneasy over security risks as they wander to other sites.  Start-up costs can range in the thousands of dollars range and there will be ongoing maintenance costs to remain PCI-compliant.

2. Third party providers
Another option is to redirect the donor to a third party for collection. Google offers a good deal for this, with their nonprofit grant program. Normally, the fees are 2.9% plus $0.30 per transaction if the total monthly volume is under $3,000. Fees are reduced with higher volume, as far as  1.9% if the total transaction volume is in excess of $100,000 a month. However, Google offers Google Grants to nonprofits. Recipients of these grants will not pay transaction fees until January 1, 2012. You can learn more  and apply online at http://www.google.com/grants.

Paypal offers a similar service, with the added advantage that donations can be made through PayPal or with a credit card. The fee is lower (2.2% + $0.30/transaction). To get more information, visit http://merchant.paypal.com and navigate to the ‘Business’ tab, click on ‘Industry Solutions’ for Nonprofits.

Neither service has a setup fee and both require proof of 501(c)(3) status and a valid website for the organization (to host the “Give Now” button).

3. Social Media
Another fundraising option that has been gaining steam over the last several years is through the use of various social media outlets. Social sharing is very popular and allows people to share your organization’s mission and donation links with their friends and contacts.

Facebook Causes are a popular way to organize people online around a particular cause or organization. Facebook has partnered with Causes.com and NetworkForGood’s DonateNow program. The DonateNow program has a $199 setup fee and $49.95 monthly fee with a 3% transaction charge. DonateNow also allows standard online credit card donations in addition to its integration to Facebook Causes. You can get more information at http://www1.networkforgood.org/for-nonprofits/fundraising/donatenow.

Other sites offer higher fee services, but it is usually part of a more comprehensive suite of services to run an entire campaign. Generally, they have both set-up and monthly fees. There is no question that the power of online giving and online awareness for nonprofits is the future of fundraising. It offers a convenient way for people to give and generally costs less than investing in a larger campaign. Online options are easily accessed, easily shared and help create awareness.

Check back next month as we will provide tips on how to promote your online giving tools.

Share

By: Tanya Dunkle, Assurance Services Manager

Recent focus by the IRS on the activities of charities has reminded me how important it is for organizations to remain focused on the mission they set forth to the IRS when they applied for tax-exemption.  Let’s face it, over time organizations and their activities evolve, many times driven by the funding they pursue.  And sometimes evolution occurs to the point that management teams lose sight of the requirements that the IRS has placed on organizations to maintain their exempt status.  So here’s a brief refresher.

In order to maintain tax-exempt status, section 501(c)(3) organizations must be operated exclusively for exempt purposes.  If more than an insubstantial part of an organization’s activities do not further an exempt purpose, its tax exempt status may be in jeopardy.  Some common threats that may endanger an organization’s exempt status are discussed below.

Private Inurement

Exempt organizations are required to be organized and operated in such a way that no part of their net earnings inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.  A private shareholder or individual is a person who has a personal or private interest in the activities of the organization and which normally has control over the decisions of the entity.  These people are referred to as insiders, and can include individuals such as the organization’s trustees, officers, members, creators or contributors.

Although not all inclusive, the following transactions with insiders are examples of private inurement:

  • Unreasonable compensation or benefits
  • Improper personal use of an organization’s assets
  • Purchases, sales or property rentals that are not at arm’s length
  • Forgiveness of indebtedness owed by insiders
  • Personal expenses paid by the exempt organization

Exempt organizations should avoid all transactions that could have the appearance of providing unreasonable benefits to insiders.  To reduce the possibility of private inurement, all transactions with insiders should be carefully analyzed and documented before they are entered into.  Policies such as having a compensation committee review the compensation packages of officers, reviewing every financial relationship with insiders for reasonableness, and properly documenting transactions will help minimize the possibility of private inurement.

Political Activities

Organizations exempt from tax under section 501(c)(3) are prohibited from being directly or indirectly involved in a political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office. Organizations cannot endorse candidates, raise funds for or donate to candidates, or become involved in any activity that would support or oppose any candidate.  Participation in political activities, even if not a substantial part of the organization’s activities, can result in excise tax or the loss of tax exempt status. This is particularly an area of risk as the 2012 general election season is right around the corner.

Lobbying Activities

Although lobbying activities are permitted, a section 501(c)(3) organization can risk its exempt status if  lobbying activities make up a substantial part of its activities. Lobbying expenditures are expenditures made for the purpose of attempting to influence legislation. An organization that engages in lobbying activities can make a safe-harbor election under section 501(h) that allows eligible organizations to use a mechanical test to determine allowable limits on lobbying expenditures.

Substantial Unrelated Business Activity

While organizations exempt under section 501(c)(3) are not prohibited from conducting an unrelated business activity, the unrelated activities cannot be the primary purpose of the exempt entity. The primary purpose of an exempt organization must be the entity’s exempt purpose. Determining whether an organization passes the primary purpose test depends on the facts and circumstances and is subject to determination by the IRS. Engaging in an unrelated activity that consumes a substantial amount of the organization’s time or resources may put the organization’s exempt status in jeopardy. And, of course, any unrelated business activity subjects the organization to payment of income taxes on that income.

Noncompliance with Annual Filing Requirements

An organization’s tax-exempt status will be automatically revoked when an exempt organization that is required file an annual return does not do so for three consecutive years. This includes all organizations required to file Form 990, 990-EZ, 990PF or Form 990-N. The IRS has been all over this for the last several years, as they are in the process of revoking the exempt status of thousands of organizations.

If an organization’s tax-exempt status is revoked, it is no longer able to receive tax-deductible contributions. In addition, the organization may be required to file a federal income tax return and pay any applicable taxes. And regaining such tax favored status requires going through the whole application process.

Share

« Previous PageNext Page »